IPC Section 480: Using a false trade mark: Repealed by the Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958, w.e.f. 25th. November, 1959

Rep. by the Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 (43 of 1958)

IPC Section 480: Simplified Explanation

Section 480 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) deals with the offence of counterfeiting a mark used by a public servant. This section specifically targets individuals who counterfeit any mark a public servant uses to authenticate any document that is not supposed to be signed or stamped. Essentially, it addresses creating fake official marks, which a public servant might use to verify or authenticate various forms of documentation. 

This provision maintains the integrity of official marks and prevents their misuse in creating fraudulent documents or impersonating official authorisations. It also protects the authenticity of administrative processes by ensuring that counterfeit marks cannot be used to deceive individuals or authorities. 

Is IPC Section 480 Bailable? 

IPC Section 480 is bailable. This means that the accused has the right to be released on bail, usually upon furnishing a bond or surety determined by the police or court, depending on the case specifics. 

IPC Section 480 Punishment 

Under IPC Section 480, the Punishment for counterfeiting a mark used by a public servant is imprisonment for a term that may extend to two years, a fine, or both. This penalty is aimed at deterring the act of counterfeiting official marks and upholding the trust in documents authenticated by public servants. 

Example of IPC Section 480 

A real-life example of an offence under IPC Section 480 could involve an individual creating counterfeit inspection marks or certification stamps that a public health inspector uses. Suppose someone manufactures fake health inspection stamps and uses them to authenticate restaurant hygiene certificates without actual inspections. This act would fall under IPC Section 480, as it involves counterfeiting marks that public servants (in this case, health inspectors) use, misleading the public and potentially risking health by certifying unverified establishments.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *