IPC Section 432: Mischief by causing inundation or obstruction to public drainage attended with damage

Whoever commits mischief by doing any act which causes or which he knows to be likely to cause an inundation or an obstruction to any public drainage attended with injury or damage, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to five years, or with fine, or with both.

IPC Section 432: Simplified Explanation

IPC Section 432 deals with mischief caused by inundation or obstruction to public drainage. This section applies when an individual intentionally or knowingly causes flooding or obstructs any public drainage system, which can result in waterlogging flooding or damage to public or private property. The essential elements of this offence include the intent to cause harm and the actual act of causing inundation or obstructing public drainage systems, thereby affecting their functionality and utility. 

Is IPC Section 432 bailable? 

IPC Section 432 is bailable. Given that the offence involves property and infrastructure damage rather than direct physical harm to individuals, it allows for the possibility of bail under judicial discretion. 

IPC Section 432 Punishment 

The punishment under IPC Section 432 involves imprisonment of either description for a term extending to five years, with a fine, or with both. The punishment reflects the seriousness of disrupting public infrastructure and causing potential widespread damage and inconvenience. 

Example of IPC Section 432 

A real-life example of IPC Section 432 involved a construction company illegally blocking a major public drainage channel to divert water for its project. This action caused severe waterlogging in the surrounding residential area, damaging homes and properties. The affected residents reported the incident to the authorities. The individuals responsible for the construction company were arrested and charged under IPC Section 432 for obstruction to public drainage. In court, they were found guilty, sentenced to two years in prison, and fined, demonstrating the legal consequences of irresponsible actions that disrupt public utilities and cause harm to the community.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *