Whoever dishonestly receives or retains any stolen property, the possession whereof he knows or has reason to believe to have been transferred by the commission of dacoity, or dishonestly receives from a person, whom he knows or has reason to believe to belong or to have belonged to a gang of dacoits, property which he knows or has reason to believe to have been stolen, shall be punished with imprisonment for life, or with rigorous imprisonment for a term which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine.
IPC Section 412: Simplified Explanation
IPC Section 412 specifically deals with the offence of dishonestly receiving or retaining property that has been stolen during the commission of a dacoity. This section applies to individuals who come into possession of such property knowing or having reason to believe it was obtained through the violent and organized crime of dacoity. The law aims to deter the support network that allows dacoits to profit from their crimes by penalizing those who facilitate or participate in the handling of stolen goods.
Is IPC Section 412 bailable?
IPC Section 412 is non-bailable. The involvement of property stolen in dacoity, a particularly violent and organized form of crime, elevates the seriousness of this offence, warranting stricter judicial oversight for any release of the accused.
IPC Section 412 Punishment
The punishment under IPC Section 412 involves imprisonment for life or rigorous imprisonment for a term extending to ten years and includes a liability to a fine. This severe penalty reflects the high stakes and societal impact of crimes associated with dacoity and the critical role of those who receive such stolen property in perpetuating criminal networks.
Example of IPC Section 412
A real-life example of IPC Section 412 occurred when law enforcement officials busted a network selling stolen vehicles during a series of dacoities. One individual, a used car dealer, was found with several vehicles that were identified as stolen from violent dacoity incidents. Investigations revealed that he regularly purchased these vehicles far below market value, knowing they were stolen, to resell for profit. His actions not only facilitated but also financially supported the dacoit gangs. He was arrested and charged under IPC Section 412. In court, given the severity of his involvement and the impact on the victims of dacoity, he was sentenced to life imprisonment and fined, underscoring the stringent legal approach to curbing the entire ecosystem of crime associated with dacoity.
