Whoever attempts to commit robbery shall be punished with rigorous imprisonment for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine.
IPC Section 393: Simplified Explanation
IPC Section 393 deals with the offence of attempting to commit robbery. This section targets situations where an individual takes substantial steps towards committing a robbery but is prevented from completing the act due to various circumstances. It recognizes the potential danger and threat posed by the mere attempt to rob, irrespective of the outcome, and holds individuals accountable for their intentions and actions leading up to the potential crime.
Is IPC Section 393 bailable?
IPC Section 393 is non-bailable. The intent and actions aimed at committing robbery represent a significant threat to public safety and security, necessitating stringent legal control and judicial consideration for bail.
IPC Section 393 Punishment
Under IPC Section 393, the punishment for attempting to commit robbery is rigorous imprisonment for a term that may extend to seven years, and the offender is also liable to a fine. This sentence reflects the seriousness of the preparatory actions and the potential harm that could have resulted from a completed robbery.
Example of IPC Section 393
A real-life example of IPC Section 393 involved a person who was apprehended while attempting to rob a jewellery store. The individual, armed and masked, entered the store but was quickly noticed by a vigilant security guard who activated the alarm system. Police arrived promptly, preventing the robbery from being completed. Despite not successfully stealing anything, the person was charged under IPC Section 393 for the clear attempt and preparation to commit robbery. In court, due to the evident intent and significant preparatory actions, the individual received a sentence of five years in prison and a fine, underscoring the legal consequences of even attempting such a serious offence.
