IPC Section 392: Punishment for robbery

Whoever commits robbery shall be punished with rigorous imprisonment for a term which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine; and, if the robbery be committed on the highway between sunset and sunrise, the imprisonment may be extended to fourteen years.

IPC Section 392: Simplified Explanation

IPC Section 392 outlines the punishment for robbery, as defined in IPC Section 390. This section specifies that anyone committing robbery is liable for severe legal consequences. Robbery involves the elements of theft or extortion. Still, it is distinguished by the immediate use of violence, threat, or injury to a person to carry out the theft or extortion. It is a crime that poses a direct threat to personal safety as well as property. 

Is IPC Section 392 bailable? 

IPC Section 392 is non-bailable. Due to the violent nature of the offence and the significant threat it poses to the safety of individuals and public order, it is treated with utmost seriousness, and bail can only be granted under judicial discretion. 

IPC Section 392 Punishment 

Under IPC Section 392, the punishment for robbery can be rigorous imprisonment for a term ranging from 3 to 14 years, depending on the severity of the circumstances. The offender is also liable to a fine. If the robbery causes grievous hurt or if the offender is armed with a deadly weapon, the term of imprisonment may be on the higher end of this range. 

Example of IPC Section 392 

A real-life example of IPC Section 392 occurred when a man was confronted by three individuals while withdrawing money from an ATM late at night. The perpetrators threatened him with a knife and forcibly took the money he had just withdrawn, along with his wallet and mobile phone. The incident was captured on the ATM’s security cameras, leading to the swift arrest of the culprits. In court, due to the clear evidence of robbery involving threats and the use of a weapon, they were convicted under IPC Section 392. They received sentences of 10 years in prison. They were ordered to pay a fine, highlighting the severe legal response to such acts of robbery.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *