Whoever makes or mends, or performs any part of the process of making or mending, or buys, sells or disposes of, any die or instrument, for the purpose of being used, or knowing or having reason to believe that it is intended to be used, for the purpose of counterfeiting coin, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extended to three years, and shall also be liable to fine.
IPC Section233: Simplified Explanation
IPC Section 233 addresses the offence related to making or selling instruments for counterfeiting coins. According to this section, any person who makes mends, or performs any part of the process of making or mending, or buys, sells, or disposes of any machinery, instrument, or material with the knowledge that it is intended to be used, or knowing or having reason to believe that it is designed to be used, for the purpose of counterfeiting coin, is guilty of an offence. This section aims to prevent the production and distribution of tools that can be used to create counterfeit coins, thereby protecting the integrity of the currency system.
Is IPC Section 233 bailable?
The offence under IPC Section 233 is non-bailable. This means that an individual accused of making or selling instruments for counterfeiting coins does not have the right to be released on bail automatically. Bail can only be granted at the discretion of the court, which will consider the seriousness of the offence, the evidence against the accused, and the potential risk of the accused absconding or tampering with evidence.
IPC Section 233 Punishment
The punishment for the offence under IPC Section 233 is severe, reflecting the gravity of the crime. A person convicted under this section can be punished with imprisonment of either description (rigorous or straightforward) for a term that may extend to seven years, along with a fine. The punishment aims to deter individuals from engaging in activities that facilitate the counterfeiting of coins and to uphold the integrity of the monetary system.
Example of IPC Section 233
A real-life example of IPC Section 233 could involve an individual named Vinay, who was discovered operating a workshop where he manufactured dies and moulds designed explicitly for producing counterfeit coins. Vinay also sold these tools to others who intended to use them for counterfeiting. After a police raid on his workshop, Vinay was arrested and charged under IPC Section 233. Given the non-bailable nature of the offence, he was not granted bail and was detained during the trial. Upon conviction, Vinay was sentenced to seven years of rigorous imprisonment and fined a significant amount, demonstrating the legal system’s stringent approach to preventing the facilitation of coin counterfeiting.
