Indian Divorce Act

Form No. 7: Statement in reply to No. 6

Statement in reply to No. 6

In the (High) Court of _
B. against B
This _ day of _
The Petitioner, C.B. by her attorney [or vakil] says-

  1. That ,he denies that she condoned the said adultery of the respondent with E.F. as in the second paragraph of the statement in answer alleged.
  2. That even if she had condoned the said adultery, the same has been revived by the subsequent adultery of the respondent with G.H. as set forth in the fourth paragraph of the Petition.
    (Signed) C.B.
  1. State the respective ages of the children.
  2. The Petition must be signed by the Petitioner.

Vardhaman Raj

Vardhaman Raj is a distinguished advocate with over 25 years of experience in the Indian legal system. Vardhaman has dedicated his career to criminal law and civil rights, gaining a reputation for his unwavering integrity, meticulous attention to detail, and compassionate advocacy for his clients. Vardhaman's expertise spans various legal areas, including criminal defence, family law, and public interest litigation.

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button